| Dear President Bush,
The "dolphin-safe" label
on tuna cans is important because it assures the public that the
tuna we buy and eat is not being caught in a way that is harmful
to dolphins, a highly intelligent marine mammal. The whole purpose
of the "dolphin-safe" tuna label program, a provision
under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, was to support this ideal.
Advances in modern technology have led the way to several
alternative tuna fishing methods that are not harmful to dolphins
and have met with a very positive success rate. These alternative
fishing methods meet the requirements for a
"dolphin-safe" certification under the label program.
Intentionally netting dolphins, as
in the purse seine method, should not be considered meeting the
certification requirements and guidelines, and the
"spoils" of this method should not be allowed to be
marketed as "dolphin-safe." The intentional chasing and
netting of dolphins while in pursuit of tuna does not sit well on
my conscience. This type of tuna fishing has devastating effects
on dolphin populations. Dolphins can become entangled in nets and
easily injure themselves. As a mammal, dolphins need air to
breathe and when they get trapped under water they can drown.
Mothers and calves can get separated while being chased and this
can be fatal to the calves, who are very dependent upon their
mothers for both protection and food.
I would not knowingly buy a can of
tuna that was caught in a way harmful to dolphins. Please do not
allow the Commerce Department to weaken the definition of the
"dolphin-safe" label. Allowing tuna caught by this
harmful technique to be sold under the "dolphin-safe"
label is outrageous and would give the impression that we support
false advertising. I would rather we live by the wisdom of
honestly is the best policy. I would urge you, Mr. President, to
keep intact the ban on sale and import of tuna caught by
intentionally netting dolphins and thus preserve the original
integrity of the "dolphin-safe" label.
Sincerely,
Caitlin L.
Stafford, VA |